Archives for category: Q&A

CNN gets an F for that whole mess.In the words of Blaine Edwards and Antoine Merriweather: hated it. It felt to me like two hours of rubbing salt in the wounds of the problems in the Black community while offering little (if any) solutions toward remedying these staggering conditions. I mentioned sometime during my Twitterfest during the two 2-hour installments that I felt like CNN phoned it in. In Part 1, they mainly focused on the Rand family, picked and chose relatives from within that one family, and tried to present it as a microcosm of Black women in America. Part 2 focused on two men attached by the Little Rock Nine and their struggles while presenting it as a microcosm of Black men in America. Overall, neither installment did their topics full justice. Or even half justice, to be honest. The series felt like a primer for non-Black communities to get a glimpse into the Black community through use of an annoying spoken word poet, bold fonts, and statistics (without explanation). Overall, it just rubbed me the wrong way for several reasons (even more than what’s mentioned here). Then again, could you really expect an American news organization to condense the 200+ year “Black experience” in all its intricacies and nuances and developments since the assassination of Dr. King forty years ago into just a four-hour period?

Deep sighs all around.

So what did you think about the series? Provocative? Watered-down? Necessary? Share your thoughts here, and please, do not hold back. I sure as hell won’t.

After almost five years here, I’m surprised I’m even getting these kinds of e-mails. But nonetheless, people still ask: why did you call your site “Black” gay blogger?

Hi. This is the first time I’ve ever written into a bloger site before, but I have to ask — why is your website called BLACK GAY BLOGGER? Is this because you’re Black? I don’t get it. As a white gay man, I’m surrounded by people form all walks of life, but i just dont’ see race! I don’t know why people like you put so much emphasis on race, and i really don’t know why your site is called BLACK GAY BLOGGER. I don’t even see that many Black people on here lol!

Now, I didn’t say they actually communicated their point intelligently now, did I?

While I definitely don’t write as much these days as I used to (work and school will do that to you), I’d still like to think that my perspective on issues and gay life in general is one that’s not in the mainstream, on Logo or in any of the gay rag mags. And regardless of the catch-all of sexuality which LGBT folks are thrown into, there are differences between us — especially race. And it may be because while each side recognizes the other side’s differences, they choose not to do shit about it. And therein lies the separation.

“I don’t see race”…puh-leeze. It always kills me when some LGBT people say they don’t “see” race. It must be blissful to be that ignorant on something so prevalent in today’s society.

In any regard, I called my site Black Gay Blogger because five years ago, it was out there and avant garde…sorta. Now? Not so much. But I bought the domain, so there you have it.

And as far as not seeing that many Black people on here? Tell that to the thousands of hits I get on the daily for pictures of Tracee Ellis Ross and Naima Mora.

[tags]black gay blogger, sexual identity, race, homosexuality[/tags]

Bryant Purvis and Carwin Jones, holding up the total of their minutes of fame.

 

Two of the much talked about Jena 6 holding up the number of their remaining minutes of "fame"? Check.

The same two stunting on the red carpet and showing the thousands of people who fought for their cause, wore black, and marched in their town for their sake that, so far, it’s amounted to presenting at the BET Awards? Check. 

Horrible intersection of social justice and pop culture entertainment which serves little use for either notion? Check.

Further evidence of BET’s ignorance in and about the Black community? Check.

Yeah…y’all can have this.

 

Technorati Tags: , ,