|
Posted on 04/03/08 @ 6:42 pm
After almost five years here, I'm surprised I'm even getting these kinds of e-mails. But nonetheless, people still ask: why did you call your site "Black" gay blogger? Hi. This is the first time I've ever written into a bloger site before, but I have to ask — why is your website called BLACK GAY BLOGGER? Is this because you're Black? I don't get it. As a white gay man, I'm surrounded by people form all walks of life, but i just dont' see race! I don't know why people like you put so much emphasis on race, and i really don't know why your site is called BLACK GAY BLOGGER. I don't even see that many Black people on here lol! Now, I didn't say they actually communicated their point intelligently now, did I? While I definitely don't write as much these days as I used to (work and school will do that to you), I'd still like to think that my perspective on issues and gay life in general is one that's not in the mainstream, on Logo or in any of the gay rag mags. And regardless of the catch-all of sexuality which LGBT folks are thrown into, there are differences between us — especially race. And it may be because while each side recognizes the other side's differences, they choose not to do shit about it. And therein lies the separation. "I don't see race"…puh-leeze. It always kills me when some LGBT people say they don't "see" race. It must be blissful to be that ignorant on something so prevalent in today's society. In any regard, I called my site Black Gay Blogger because five years ago, it was out there and avant garde…sorta. Now? Not so much. But I bought the domain, so there you have it. And as far as not seeing that many Black people on here? Tell that to the thousands of hits I get on the daily for pictures of Tracee Ellis Ross and Naima Mora. Technorati Tags: black gay blogger, sexual identity, race, homosexuality Filed under: Q&A Comments: 6 Comments |
|
Posted on 10/16/07 @ 1:20 pm
Two of the much talked about Jena 6 holding up the number of their remaining minutes of "fame"? Check. The same two stunting on the red carpet and showing the thousands of people who fought for their cause, wore black, and marched in their town for their sake that, so far, it's amounted to presenting at the BET Awards? Check. Horrible intersection of social justice and pop culture entertainment which serves little use for either notion? Check. Further evidence of BET's ignorance in and about the Black community? Check. Yeah…y'all can have this.
Filed under: Entertainment and Q&A Comments: 14 Comments |
|
Posted on 09/20/07 @ 2:37 pm
But aside from all that's going on with the case, I've noticed there's been a recent surge in the number of racial incidents, snafus, faux-pas, uh-oh's and other foolishment which have been reported. Here's just a small sampling from the past six months:
If you're a minority in America, shit like this has to make you wonder if anything has really changed in the grand scope of race relations in the past forty or so years. For every link that's here, there are probably tens of hundreds of other incidents which haven't been reported that are going on every day. Perhaps what's worse than this reality is the atmosphere of intolerance towards those who speak up against it. They're called race baiters or asked why they can't just "get over it" (the "it" being slavery/discrimination/getting called a racial slur, etc.). Well it's kind of hard to get over something when you're always under some kind of discrimination based on your race, either overt or covert. And it's not just a "Southern" thing, as evidenced by the links above; it seems the further removed the offenders are from the source of their offense, the more it's deemed "OK" and "not a big deal". America seriously needs to have a knock-down, drag-out, 12-round honest discussion about race and race relations. Otherwise, incidents like Jena and Logan, WV and the countless college "race themed" parties are going to continue to happen, and people will keep wondering why. Filed under: News and Q&A Comments: 11 Comments |
|
Posted on 06/23/07 @ 8:50 pm
Most major cities in the U.S. have more than one Pride event, and Atlanta's no different. This weekend, there will be over 300,000 people involved, including those traveling to the city for the Atlanta Pride events. And in September, there will be over 100,000 people coming to the city for the annual Black Gay Pride festivities. One city. Two events. But why? Personally, I understand why there are two different events. Whenever you involve an event which is supposed to represent a large and diverse group of people, you're going to end up leaving something out that you missed (either intentionally or unintentionally). So people from that group make their own event to address those things left out. I don't think it's so much an issue of exclusion as it is a lack of cooperative inclusion. That's my two cents. But what do you think? Why do most cities have different Pride celebrations for different ethnic groups? I'm asking here on the blog, but I also fielded that question in a few other arenas. And the responses are…well…let's say that while I can't determine the particular race of the people who responded, some people's responses are pretty self-explanatory. Filed under: Q&A Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 12/07/06 @ 10:58 pm
I'm putting the question out there. If you're a Black lesbian blogger here in Atlanta, please drop me a line or leave a comment with your blog link. Don't be shy! Filed under: Q&A Comments: 2 Comments |
| Previous Posts » |





